THE NON-EXISTENT VIRUS: LIES AND CONSEQUENCES

Throughout this false pandemic, I have been listing and explaining each piece of the domino:

The false claim that a virus exists.

The development of a diagnostic test to detect the virus that does not exist.

Based on the test, the publication of sky-high case numbers, all of which are obviously meaningless.

Based on bogus case numbers and absurd computer projections of cases and deaths to come, the imprisonment of people in their homes, the closing and destruction of businesses, the demolition of economies, and then …

The introduction of a highly destructive vaccine as a solution.

These are the consequences that resulted from the false “discovery” of a new virus.

Lately, there has been a resurgence of interest in one or two documents that I cited months ago. These documents reveal the deception at the end of the testing of a virus that does not exist. The papers, written by the constructors of the test, admit that an isolated sample of the virus IS NOT AVAILABLE. But they still use a test to identify it.

This is on the order of a doctor who says to a patient, “I’m going to test you for XQ disease.”

The patient asks, “What is XQ disease?”

The physician responds, “WE HAVE NO IDEA. But we want to know if you have it.”

Let’s go to the first smoking gun.

The CDC document is titled “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel.” It was originally published in February 2020, in the early days of the “pandemic,” and its latest revision was published in July 2021.

Buried deep in the document, in a section titled, “Performance Characteristics,” we have this: “Since there are no quantified 2019-nCoV [SARS-CoV-2] virus isolates currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized full-length RNA strains transcribed in vitro … ” (document page 40, pdf page 41).

The key phrase is: “Since quantified virus isolates of [virus] 2019-nCoV are not currently available …”

Every object that exists can be quantified, i.e. measured. The use of the term “quantified” in that sentence means: the CDC does not have virus because it is not available. THE CDC DOES NOT HAVE THE VIRUS.

One of the two most powerful public health agencies in the world can’t get the virus anywhere. Why? Evidently, because no one has it.

Another clue is the use of the word “isolate”. This means there is NO ISOLATED VIRUS AVAILABLE.

Another way of putting it: NO ONE HAS AN ISOLATED SAMPLE OF THE SARS COV-19 VIRUS.

NO ONE HAS ISOLATED THE VIRUS.

THEREFORE, NO ONE HAS PROVEN THAT IT EXISTS.

As if this is not a revelation to shock the world, the CDC goes on to say that they are introducing a diagnostic PCR test, in that very article I am quoting, to detect the virus that has not been isolated … and the test looks for RNA that is PRESUMED to be from the virus that has not been proven to exist.

And using this test, the CDC and every other public health agency in the world continues to count COVID cases and deaths … and governments instituting shutdowns and economic devastation using those case and death numbers as justification.

The pandemic is a fraud, right down to the root of the poisonous tree.

And now, let’s turn to a second key document. This one served as the basis for the first PCR test to detect the COVID virus worldwide.

READ WHAT THIS STUDY SAYS. These quotes should be set in stone above the entrance to a museum dedicated to the history of medical fraud.

“Our goal was to develop and implement a robust diagnostic methodology [a virus test] for use in public health laboratory settings without having virus material available.”

TRANSLATION: We want to develop a test to detect the new virus without having the virus available.

“Here we present a validated diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV [SARS-CoV-2] whose design is based on the close genetic relationship of 2019-nCoV to the [earlier 2003] SARS coronavirus, making use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.”

It seems that the pandemic is further advancing the visual arts,
fantasy art” branch, than virology.

TRANSLATION: WE HAVE developed a diagnostic test to detect the new COVID virus. WE ASSUME that this new virus exists and is closely related to an older coronavirus. WE ASSUME that we know HOW it is related. We assume this because we do not have the new COVID virus. Therefore, all of our assumptions are made out of thin air. In reality, we have no evidence that there is a new coronavirus.

“The workflow reliably detects 2019-nCoV and further discriminates 2019-nCoV from [pre-2003] SARS-CoV.”

TRANSLATION: Our new test to detect the new virus? We don’t have the new virus. We have never observed it. We can’t study it directly. There is no evidence that it exists. But we will create and use a test to detect it.

The study is titled “Detection of the new 2019 coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR.” [Euro Surveill. 2020 Jan; 25 (3): 2000045. doi: 10.2807 / 1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045. doi: 10.2807 / 1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045.]

Those quotes from the study are staggering. Diagnostic test for virus when there is no virus, when there is no standard with which to compare the reliability of the test.

The authors blithely assume that they can somehow infer that the virus exists without having an isolated sample.

They then assume that they can understand the structure of the virus that does not exist.

The virus is not there. It has NOT been isolated. It has NOT been separated from other materials. Therefore, it has never been observed and has not been proven to exist.

And yet, the test that these authors have developed is launched, worldwide, to promote the undemonstrated idea that a pandemic exists; to form the basis for counting the numbers of COVID cases; and, ultimately, to justify all the confinements that have collapsed the world economy and destroyed millions and millions of lives.

Great confusion has been created because scientists talk about the “new virus” as if they understand its genetic structure and sequence. No. They have constructed a hypothetical structure using computer tools. Nothing more. And then they mumble about what it means.

As for what is actually happening in the labs where researchers are making grand assumptions and proclamations; don’t talk to me about science. Talk to me about criminal liability.

On the fluoridefreepeel.ca site you will find about a hundred FOIA (“Freedom of Information Act”) requests to public health agencies. These requests ask for records showing that SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated. The repetitive and routine response is, “We have no records.” Taken together, they paint a picture of egregious fraud.

Mainstream scientists will make two claims: one, we have isolated the virus; and two, there is no need to isolate the virus, because we have discovered its genetic sequence. Both claims are false.

From reading the arcane language surrounding the claims of having sequenced the virus, there is a multi-layered scam composed of leaps of unwarranted assumptions. The researchers say they are using tools that allow them to closely approximate the structure of SARS-CoV-2, even though they do not have that virus isolated. This is absurd.

It is like saying: there is a new planet in the solar system. We don’t know where it is or what it looks like. We don’t know what processes are at work on this new planet. But we do know that the moon is a very close approximation of the planet. Therefore, we can know everything we need to know about the new planet from our knowledge of the moon.

Come on, a rabbit is a spaceship. And there are condos for sale on Jupiter. And the new element # 267587, on the periodic table, that no one has ever seen, is almost an exact copy of Philadelphia cream cheese.

And now we come to a third document, which is replete with devastating admissions. It was issued by the CDC.

The release is titled “07/21/2021: Laboratory Alert: Changes to CDC’s RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing.” It begins explosively:

“After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the application to the U.S. Food and Drug Admin. (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay that was first submitted in February 2020 for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. CDC is providing this advance notice so that clinical laboratories have sufficient time to select and implement one of the many FDA-cleared alternatives.”

Many people think this means that CDC is giving up on PCR testing as a means to “detect the virus.” The CDC is not saying that at all.

They say that PCR technology will continue to be used, but they are replacing what the test is looking for with a better “reference sample”. A better marker. A better target. A better RNA fragment supposedly derived from SARS-CoV-2.

The CDC/FDA confess that there has been a PROBLEM with the PCR test that has been used to detect the virus, starting February 2020, until July 21, 2021.

In other words, the millions and millions of “COVID cases” based on the PCR test in use are all suspect. In reality, that statement is too generous. Every single PCR test result should be discarded.

To confirm this, the CDC document links to an FDA release entitled “SARS-CoV-2 Reference Panel Comparative Data.” Here’s an amazing quote:

“During the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, clinical samples [of the virus] were not available to IVD [in vitro diagnostics, the PCR test] developers to detect SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, the FDA cleared IVD [tests] based on available data from artificial samples generated from a variety of sources of SARS-CoV-2 material (e.g., gene-specific RNA, synthetic RNA, or whole genome viral RNA) for analytical and clinical evaluation. While validation with these artificial samples provided a measure of confidence in test performance early in the pandemic, it is not feasible to accurately compare the performance of various tests that used artificial samples because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene-specific, synthetic or genomic nucleic acid sources.”

Translation: We, at CDC, did not have a SARS-CoV-2 virus sample when we invented the PCR test for SARS-CoV-2. We did, and that’s the test we’ve been using all along. So we CONTRIBUTED with samples of the “virus.” We fabricate. We lied. We invented [made up] synthetic gene sequences and SAID that these sequences MUST BE close to the SARS-CoV-2 sequence, without having any idea what we were doing, because, again, we didn’t have a specimen of the virus. We had no evidence that there WAS something called SARS-CoV-2.

This incredible FDA document says that the Agency has granted emergency approval to 59 different PCR tests since the start of the (fake) pandemic. 59. And, “…it is not feasible to accurately compare the performance of various tests that used artificial samples because each test validated performance using samples derived from different genomic, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources.”

Translation: Each of the 59 different PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 incurred different lies and invented different possibilities about the genetic makeup of the virus, the virus that we didn’t have. So, obviously, these tests would give useless and meaningless results. It was all a fantasy.

BUT, don’t worry, be happy, because NOW, say the CDC and FDA, they actually have real isolated samples of SARS-CoV-2 virus from patients; they have better targets for PCR testing, and labs should start preparing for the new and improved tests.

In other words, they were lying THEN, but they are not lying NOW. They were “devising”, but now they are telling the truth.

If you believe that, I have Fountain of Youth water for sale, drawn from the lead contaminated system in Flint, Michigan.

We KNOW they are lying now, because they continue to twist the meaning of the word “isolate”. Here, once again, I present the virological version of “we possess isolated specimens of the virus”:

They have a soup that they make in their laboratories.

This soup contains human and monkey cells, toxic chemicals and drugs, and all sorts of random genetic material. Because cells start dying in that concoction, the researchers ASSUME that a little bit of mucus from a patient that they dropped into the soup is causing death, and THE VIRUS must be the killing agent in the mucus.

This assumption is totally unjustified. The drugs and chemicals could be killing the cells, and the researchers are also depriving the cells of vital nutrients, and that starvation is enough to kill the cells.

There is no evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is in the soup, or that it is killing cells, or that it exists.

However, researchers call the cell death “virus isolation.”

To say this is a non-sequitur is an understatement. In their universe, “We assume, without evidence, that we have the virus buried in a soup in a dish in the lab” is the same as, “We have separated the virus from all the surrounding material.”

Virology amounts to “how to spread stupid things for a living and scare the world and lock it up and inoculate it with a devastating destructive vaccine”.

Other than that, it’s perfect.

Jon Rappoport

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: