NOBODY has yet proven the existence of Sars-Cov-2.
sense to make an object of faith out of a supposedly scientific construct?
an object of faith? Well, that …

There are two types of virologists.

First, those who claim to be isolating viruses. I have written many articles debunking their absurd position. They define isolation as “swimming in a soup of many substances and never separating from the soup”. In other words, these virologists define “isolated” as “not isolated.” This could be called an Orwellian-scientific neo-language. Pure nonsense.

Then there are the “more sophisticated” virologists who say: “Viruses can only live in liquid inside a cell. Therefore, they can never be separated from the cell or the liquid. To demand isolation is asking the impossible. We can discover the genetic sequences of these viruses without isolating them. Forget isolation. The mere discovery of the genetic sequences proves that viruses exist”.

Let us examine this second type of virology.

Let’s go back to the time when scientists first decided that viruses existed. After all, THEY made the original claim. The burden of proof was on THEM. And they made that decision long before there was a procedure called genetic sequencing.

If isolation is impossible, if these viruses swim forever in the fluid inside cells, without isolation, HOW DID SCIENTISTS FIRST DISCOVER THE VIRUSES?

On what basis did they make their discovery?

Through direct observation? Certainly not, if viruses can never separate from the liquid in which they swim.

“We discovered for the first time the existence of viruses that cannot be isolated by …”

By what, singing songs? By talking to an ancestor of Antony Fauci? By finding out how much money was in the Rockefeller family bank accounts?

“No, look. Here’s how it works. NOW we say that virus isolation is impossible, because people accuse us of not isolating viruses. But THEN, way back when scientists first discovered the existence of viruses, they knew that viruses HAD TO EXIST.”

“How did they know?”

“Because all the other explanations for why people got sick with certain diseases didn’t work, they fell short.”

“I see. So there was only ONE other possibility. Viruses.”

“That’s right.”

“Do you realize what a ridiculous position that is?”

“No comment.”

And that’s really the end of the story. There was no “original discovery” of viruses. There was just an assumption backed up by …. nothing.

And now, when virologists claim that they don’t need to isolate viruses because they can design their genetic sequences, another ridiculous situation arises. HOW DO YOU ANALYZE THE STRUCTURE OF SOMETHING YOU CAN’T ISOLATE?

How do you describe the structure of a thing when you can’t observe it?

You DON’T describe the structure. You pretend that you do.

You refer to other structures that are themselves just pretends, and you pick out pieces of those pretend structures and improvise them, and say, “Here it is. This is the genetic sequence.”

This would be like a store owner holding out his empty hand to the mob thugs who showed up to collect their protection money for the week. The owner says, “Here’s your four hundred dollars – can’t you see it? “

After a thug pulls out his gun, the store owner opens the wall safe, pulls out strange bills and hands them over. The bills are pieces of money from a game called Monopoly. They are pieces of money from American, French, German, Italian, Spanish Monopoly, glued together.

And that’s called “genetic virus sequencing”. Glue money.

I will address two more points.

As Dr. Tom Cowan has said, according to the conventional hypothesis of virus infection, viruses must leave cells and travel to other cells. Otherwise, how can the infection spread throughout the body? But this description assumes that viruses CAN live and thrive outside the fluid in cells.

Therefore, the claim that viruses cannot be isolated because they always live in fluid inside cells is false.

Which would bring us back to the first type of virologist, the one who says he IS isolating viruses, but can’t prove it, because his definition of isolation is “swimming inside the soup and never separated from the soup”.

And finally, what about electron microscope photos purporting to show isolated viruses? This is a subject fraught with conflict and misunderstanding. It is far from settled science. Many of the so-called viruses in these photos are cells that are “budding,” as if something is about to leave the cell, but has not yet done so. Virologists will arbitrarily call these things viruses, without visual proof.

Then there are exosomes, “microvesicles released by cells in both physiological and pathological situations.” They are mistaken for viruses, but are in fact other genetic material that can be misidentified as viruses.

People wishing to explore this thorny problem should read the works of Harold Hillman, a leading critic of electron microscopy methods, who was expelled from the scientific community for his findings. Hillman once wrote: “Electron microscopists have ignored the dictates of solid geometry and most of the apparent structures they have detected are artifacts of their preparation procedures …” In other words, electron microscopy techniques create artificial entities that are then mistaken for natural entities. .

Brian Martin, professor emeritus of social sciences at the University of Wollongong, Australia, writes: “In one case, Hillman gave a talk to a large audience at what he calls ‘a well-known Welsh university.’ The many undergraduates in the audience seemed sympathetic to his case. One lecturer stood up and claimed to have images from an electron microscope showing that Hillman was wrong. After the talk, Hillman asked the lecturer to show him the images. “I don’t have any,” he said, laughing. “Why did you say in front of that large audience that you had them?” “Because I didn’t want the students to be fooled by you.”

And that concludes today’s episode of “Two Schools of Virology, Both Wrong,” presented by NIH paper towels, the brand that wipes up any splash, but somehow never catches a virus.

Jon Rappoport

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: