Four out of five pregnancies are being terminated by Covid “vaccines”. And that means that the “depopulation” aspects of the Covid “vaccine” are working exactly as the globalists expected. They are at war against the human race. And non-transhumanized live-born babies are their enemy.
A shocking new study published in the New England Journal of Medicine reveals that when pregnant women receive covid vaccines during their first or second trimester they suffer an 82% miscarriage rate, killing 4 out of 5 unborn babies.
This startling finding, explained below, is evident from data published in a new study entitled “Preliminary Findings on the Safety of Covid-19 mRNA Vaccine in Pregnant Persons.” As disturbing as the data is the fact that the authors of the study apparently sought to deliberately obfuscate the truth about vaccines causing miscarriages by obfuscating numbers in their own calculations.
Originally brought to our attention by a Life Site News article, we checked with our own scientific contacts to review the data and verify all the math. In doing so, we were able to confirm two things:
Yes, the study shows an 82% rate of miscarriages in pregnant women who received covid vaccines during their first or second trimester.
Yes, the authors of the study either deliberately tried to hide this fact with dishonest obfuscation (explained below) or they are incompetent and made a glaring error that calls their credibility into question.
In other words, this study was almost certainly a cover-up to try to claim that vaccinating pregnant women is perfectly safe. But the data from the study actually show quite the opposite.
A total of 827 pregnant women were studied. Of the 827 women, 700 received their first vaccination in the third trimester of pregnancy. This means that 127 women (that’s 827 – 700) received a vaccine during their first or second trimester.
Of the 127 women who received vaccines during their first or second trimester, 104 miscarriages occurred before their pregnancies reached the 20-week mark.
In simple math, 104 miscarriages (during the first 20 weeks) out of 127 women who received vaccines in their first or second trimester calculates to an 82% miscarriage rate among these pregnant women who were vaccinated.
It is important to note that deaths of unborn babies during the third trimester are referred to as “stillbirths,” not miscarriages. Therefore, miscarriages could not have occurred in women vaccinated during their third trimester, by definition.
Therefore, the study authors dishonestly used the incorrect denominator of 827 in their calculation of “miscarriages,” when they should have used a denominator of 127, which is the number of women receiving vaccines during their first or second trimester.
Put another way, it is impossible for a woman who was first vaccinated during her third trimester to have a “miscarriage” in the first 20 weeks, since they were not vaccinated during the first 20 weeks (and pregnant women are not time travelers). Therefore, these women should not be included in the denominator used to calculate the miscarriage rate.
The authors of this study should get an award in the “How to lie with statistics” category, because they apparently tried to do a sleight-of-hand trick to make it look like vaccines are safe for pregnant women. In reality, they appear to be killing more than 4 out of 5 unborn babies in the first 20 weeks of gestation, at least in this data set. (This is a small group of 127 pregnant women, so we would like to see a larger review of many thousands of pregnancies to get a clearer picture).
A simple way to explain this with a metaphor is to imagine a bag of 50 lemons and 50 limes, with a scientific study asking, “What percentage of lemons are yellow?” The scientists count all the yellow fruit and arrive at the number 50. They mistakenly divided 50 by 100 because there are 100 pieces of fruit in total, then state, “50% of the lemons are yellow” because it is 50/100.
But the other 50 fruits cannot be included because they are limes, not lemons. So, the correct math is 50/50, which means 100% of the lemons are yellow. That is the correct answer.
In this scientific paper, they are using 827 as the denominator, even though 700 of those 827 women were only vaccinated in the third trimester, which is well beyond the window of time during which a “miscarriage” can occur. And since pregnant women are not time travelers, they cannot go back in time and report a miscarriage from months earlier.
If vaccine scientists can’t do this basic math, or are intentionally misleading the world with dishonest obfuscation of the numbers, then “science” has already failed in its primary promise: to offer “evidence-based” conclusions for understanding the world around us … .
Yet, when 4 out of 5 pregnant women lose their babies in the first 20 weeks, these scientists falsely claim that the miscarriage rate is only 12.6%. Why? Because they are covering up vaccine atrocities for political reasons, most likely.
In fact, the study’s key author, Tom T. Shimabukuro, is also mentioned in many other studies claiming to document adverse reactions in various vaccines, ranging from rotavirus vaccines to the 2009 H1N1 vaccine. The obvious question arises: did Shimabukuro make the same mistake in other studies that concluded that vaccines did not pose a significant risk of adverse events. For example, here’s another study he co-authored: “Adverse Events Following Fluzone® Intradermal Vaccine Reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2011-2013.”
That study concluded, “Review of VAERS reports did not identify any new or unexpected safety issues after TIV-ID.”
But is that conclusion based on bad math, like the study on covid vaccines given to pregnant women? We call for a review of all their methods and conclusions . Perhaps this same study architect has made the same systematic error (or possibly deliberate obfuscation) for many years, spanning many previous studies. It would not be the first time an author has been found to have made systematic errors in dozens of articles and is forced to retract.
And isn’t that what the “scientific method” demands? Peer review. Double-checking the math. Admitting errors in conclusions. That’s how science advances, by pointing out errors and demanding that they be addressed and corrected. We can’t just accept bad math and call it “science” when the bad math doesn’t work.
In the meantime, it is clear that 4 out of 5 pregnancies are being terminated by covid vaccines when those vaccines are given during the first 20 weeks (at least according to the small data set we have so far). And that means that the “depopulation” aspects of the covid vaccine are working exactly as the globalists expected.
Remember: biodistribution (pharmacokinetic) studies show that covid vaccine proteins directly target reproductive organs, such as the ovaries. Given that the spike proteins are biological weapons designed to interfere with human cells, we should not be at all surprised that they are achieving a high rate of miscarriages in pregnant women.
I recently interviewed Dr. Peter McCullough, an internal medicine expert and editor of two medical journals. While he does not characterize this as a depopulation agenda, he agrees that these vaccines are attacking pregnant women and causing more than 80% of unborn babies to be aborted. He calls it an “atrocity” and says pushing these vaccines on pregnant women is “shameful.” You can hear it in his own words in the interview below:
All this means that live births could plummet by 3.2 million over the next year in the United States alone , if all pregnant women are vaccinated during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. The number of unborn babies being killed in utero, in this case, is reaching “holocaust” levels, so this is called a medical “atrocity.”
The fields of medicine and science have turned against humanity. They are now killing babies by the millions and injecting adults with toxic weapons that are causing strokes, heart attacks, deaths and lifelong injuries.
Mike Adams
elcolectivodeuno.wordpress.com 
Actually, over 3000 pregnant women were studied. The “827” number is the number of “concluded pregnancies” (i.e. they weren’t still pregnant at the end of the study period), not the number of women involved in the study. Over 700 of those 827 were normal deliveries.
LikeLike